1825 to 1900
Historical Context
for
The Farmer's Calendar Project

By: Herrick Kimball
A 19th century farmer,
broadcast sowing his field by hand

In order to best understand the Farmer's Calendar Project, with it's compilation of historical essays, it is absolutely necessary that you begin your journey with some 19th Century historical perspective....


They Had No Electricity
The farm families who originally read the old almanacs and Farmer's Calendar essays were “off-grid” before there was a grid to be on. Country roads of that era (none of which had “blacktop” pavement) were lined with trees, not utility poles strung together with endless miles of wire. The people did not, therefore, have electric lights, water pumps, washing machines, refrigerators, space heaters, grain grinders, vacuum milking systems, or so many other appliances and tools that are common to us today.

It is worth noting that electricity was first commercially employed in 1882 by The Edison Illuminating Company to power electric light bulbs in New York City’s financial district. Nascent electrical grids were soon established in several urban centers of the nation. But it would be all the way into the mid-1930s, before the U.S. government’s Rural Electrification Program subsidized the extension of a nationwide power grid to so many outlying farms and homesteads of America.

.
They Had No Tractors
The internal combustion engine (another tool of modern necessity that depends on a grid-like supply network) was unknown on American farms until the very late 1800s. It was then that simple, one-cylinder “hit-and-miss” engines were introduced into agriculture. Fueled with gasoline or kerosene, the newfangled engines had large, heavy flywheels and a spinning pulley that transmitted power (by way of a wide, flat belt) to drive a variety of different farm machines. One such machine that I find most fascinating was the drag saw, a powered crosscut saw blade that could cut felled trees of enormous diameter into firewood-length chunks. No longer were the muscles of men required for this physically demanding work. Such a tool was a boon to people who heated their homes and cooked their food with wood, as most farmers of that time and place did  (lightweight, portable chain saws like we know today did not come into common usage until the early 1960s).

After hit-and-miss engines, came the automobile. The first mass-produced (and, therefore, affordable) automobile in America was Henry Ford’s Model T, which started rolling off the assembly line in 1908. Then, in 1917, Ford came out with the first mass-produced farm tractor, the Fordson. By the middle to late 1920s,  farm tractors were common in many sections of rural America.

Unlike horses, tractors did not need to be fed and cared for when not working. A tractor could also get more work done in a day than a team of horses.  Draft-power, including mules and even oxen, would still be used on small New England farms well into the first half of the 20th century, but animals were no match for the demands of an emerging new way of farming. Thus it was that prior to 1900, literal horse power dominated, and after 1900 it  began to declined.

.
But They Did Have
New Farm Machines
Compared to today, farming and farm life was primitive in the years 1825 to 1900. Yet, it so happens that the 19th century was an era of great technological and agricultural progress. A proliferation of labor-saving machines were invented. Primary among them were various incarnations of horse drawn grain reapers and hay making equipment.

In 1825, farmers harvested fields of ripe hay and mature grain by hand, swinging a scythe or sickle, just as had been done by farmers for centuries before them. Then, around 1844 came the invention of horse-drawn mowing machines that could cut wide swaths of hay with minimal human effort. Horse-drawn reapers did the same with fields of grain.

Continual improvements through the 1800s led to reapers that not only cut grain, but automatically string-tied it into sheaves, which would then be taken to a threshing machine that mechanically separated the grain from the stalks. No longer would farmers need to hand-bundle and hand-tie the sheaves, then hand-flail the crop to get a harvest.

That  machines made farming easier and more productive can be seen in the following statistic: In 1825, it took 250 to 300 man-hours of labor to produce 100 bushels of wheat, but by the 1890s, with improved machinery for plowing, planting, and harvesting, 100 bushels of wheat were being produced with only 40 to 50 man-hours of labor. Such advances in machinery made it possible for northern states to increase grain production during the Civil War years (1861-1865) even though the war effort siphoned off a significant number of northern farm workers.

.
They Had No Modern Plumbing
People in rural New England of the nineteenth century did not have flush toilets. Chamber pots and privies sufficed. Many houses had running water from a spring on higher land, the water flowing by gravity through a pipe down to the farm house.  Hand-dug water wells, topped with a long-handled pitcher pump were also usually outdoors, not far from the kitchen. Some homes had a pitcher pump right at the kitchen sink. A well-outfitted farm had a springhouse near the barn with continually flowing water for cooling containers of milk.
.
They Heated & Cooked With Wood
Many homes in the early 1800s utilized a fireplace for the dual purpose of cooking and heating. Then wood stoves became popular. Wood cook stoves were often outfitted with a water tank that held a ready supply of hot water.

The farm houses, many of them large, had little in the way of insulation and required a lot of wood to keep them warm during the cold New England winters. Late in the 1800s coal became popular for heating and the first coal-fired home furnaces were introduced. The earliest furnaces for central heating simply radiated heat, which flowed by convection into the upper floors.

.
They Had No....
Notably absent from the homes and farms of those days was a product so ubiquitous today, yet completely unheard of to the old farmers.... plastic. Imagine a world without plastic! It once existed and, in the span of recorded history, it wasn't really all that long ago. Natural materials, like wood, tin and iron, or plant and animal fibers, were applied to every need, and landfills were not necessary.
.
They Were “Organic” Farmers
For the first half of the 1800s, not one single New England farm used synthetic chemical pesticides, and all fertilizers were naturally-occuring amendments. In other words, the old farmers were “organic” farmers. They were organic before organic was cool. They were organic before the term was even coined—before there was any need for it.

Lacking industrial solutions to farm fertility, the old farmers focused heavily on economy of manures. In the nomenclature of the day, “manure” was not just animal waste, it was any material that could be used to increase the fertility of the land. As you will learn from this web site, no subject dominates the old farm almanac writings more than the subject of manure. It would appear that the most successful of New England farmers back then were fanatical about economizing and utilizing manure in all its forms.

However, as the century progressed, scientists were learning more about the fertility requirements of different crops. To supply those requirements, new sources of “manure” were mined and imported from faraway places, or synthesized in factories. A new word—fertilizer—entered into the common language of New England farmers, as a whole new industry arose to supply the fertilizer needs of the nation.

Meanwhile, as new insect species appeared to ravage the farm crops of New England, farmers were introduced to potent killing chemicals. Paris green, a poison originally used to kill rats in the sewer system of Paris, France, proved very effective on bugs too. It was said that a single molecule of Pairs green was sufficient to kill a Colorado Potato Beetle. To their credit, some people of that day, including the editor of the Maine Farmer’s Almanac, expressed concern about the safety of such poisons.

.
Farmers Went Into Debt
In order to afford so many amazing and wonderful new farm machines, fertilizers, and home conveniences that came out in the 1800s, rural folks needed much more money than they had been used to getting by with. After all, fancy new reapers and mowing machines were considerably more expensive than a scythe or sickle.

The problem of how to afford all the new products was “solved” by equipment dealers and merchants extending easy credit. The practice of “buy now, pay later”  became much more common, and farmers found themselves going into debt like never before.

It was contrary to the ingrained frugality of the typical farmer of that day to assume so much debt. But the new ways of farming were certainly faster and easier. The hope and expectation of greater profits was a powerful inducement to not only change how one farmed, but to break down long-standing cultural objections to indebtedness.

In order to pay off the increasing costs of farming, it was necessary to farm more land or raise more animals. So began a cycle of debt, and the necessity of farming on a larger scale to support that debt. It is a cycle that continues to this day. 

.
Farmers Became Businessmen
Early in the 1800s, farming was not so much a business as it was a way of life. Subsistence farming, as it is called today, focused on hard work and careful management of the land in order to provide the food, clothing, shelter and heating needs of the family. After that, there would be a cash crop or some home industry for money or trade. It was not a meager, grubbing subsistence that the farmers of early 1800s New England experienced; theirs was a subsistence of plenty, though not in the monetary sense that we moderns now think in.

By the end of the century, farming was focused more on increased production with the goal of making more money. Agriculture became a science. Agricultural schools came into existence. As one farm almanac writer opined in the mid 1800’s, the farm was becoming more like a factory. The industrialization of farming was well underway and modern farmers took their new role as businessmen seriously. Subsistence farming took a back seat to profit farming, and more once-independent farmers started buying their food from the grocer. It was a significant transformation in agriculture.

Nevertheless, it should be made clear that this industrialization of agriculture was slower to take hold in New England than it was on the larger Great Plains farms of the west. Small towns, small farms, and rural crossroads communities were still the norm in rural New England. The old fabric of agrarian culture was still firm and strong, though it was surely beginning to fray at the edges as the 19th century wore on and more modern farming practices were adopted.


Inexpensive & Faster Transport 
Affected Agriculture
The roadways of early 19th century America (the few that existed) were of poor quality and not conducive to mass transport of goods. It was rare for common farm folk to travel more than a few miles from their homes. Therefore, inland sections of the northeast were hindered in their ability to participate in trade markets beyond their parochial limitations. Then came the Erie Canal, a manmade 363 mile waterway connecting the Great Lakes to the Atlantic ocean. The Erie Canal was completed in 1825. More canals were built up until 1840. This network of canals allowed a tremendous quantity of agricultural products to be shipped to the New York port, and from there to anywhere in the world on ocean ships.

Before long canal transport declined as railways were established. In 1840, there were 3,000 miles of railroad track in America. Ten years later there were 30,000 miles of track. In 1869 the first transcontinental railroad was completed. By 1900 there were five railroad lines connecting the east and west coast of the nation.

In addition to a vast network of rail transport throughout the nation, the 19th century brought revolutionary changes to ocean shipping. Clipper ships were replaced with larger, faster, steam ships.

These changes in transportation had a profound impact on American agriculture. More competition from faraway markets brought farm prices down in New England. The business of farming suffered. This situation is lamented in some of the old Almanac writings.

.
Communication,
Media & Advertising
The telephone was invented in 1876 and  buy 1884 there were long distance phone lines connecting the major cities in the northeast. But farm families did not have phones.

Long distance communication was, however, possible by means of the telegraph for much of the  century. The first long-distance telegraph system was run from Washington to Baltimore, a distance of forty miles, in 1838. Telegraph messages were transmitted by dot-and-dash Morse code over telegraph lines, which typically followed the railroads. So, as the railroad system expanded, so did the telegraph system. If someone wanted to send a telegraph message they went to the telegraph office which was at the railroad station.

Radio and television were not around in the 1800s, but numerous newspapers were published throughout the century. Most of them were weekly publications and many were geared for farmers.

In 1825 there were less than 100 magazines being published in America. By 1850 there were more than 600. The first really successful American magazine was the Saturday Evening Post.

Print advertising in the 1800s became more sophisticated and extensive as the century progressed. Early almanacs had virtually no advertising. Prior to 1850, there was some simple ads for books. In the 1860s there is a noticeable increase in ads for such things as worm lozenges and other patent medicines. By the 1870s all kinds of products were being advertised on the outside pages of the almanacs, like organs, sewing machines, chocolate, clothing, and insurance, to name a few.

It’s interesting to note that in the early part of the 1800s, when people bought items at the local mercantile, all the products were generic; there were no brands of coffee or sugar or flour. This changed in 1879 with the introduction of Ivory Soap. Soon thereafter came many brands, some of which are still around. Quaker Oats, Kellogg’s Corn Flakes, and Lipton Tea are examples. A popular branded product in the farm almanacs of the 1880s is Arm & Hammer Saleratus, which we now know as baking soda.

.
About The
Farmer’s Calendar Excerpts
Almanac editors used a half-page each month to express a variety of sentiments. Occasionally they would expound upon some obscure fact like, for instance, that the earth is traveling through space at 1,100 miles per minute. More often, though, the writers would encourage farmers to diligence in their calling as tillers of the soil, with suggestions and reminders about what they should be doing each month.

The calendar essays are also imbued with what I would call an agrarian ethos. It comes through in so many commentaries espousing such down-to-earth virtues as temperance, thankfulness, generosity, kindness (to animals as well as family and neighbors) and economy—especially economy. The writers often waxed poetic when celebrating the nobility and beauty found in the work of the husbandman, and woven through the years is a thread of opinionated social commentary.

The Farmer’s Calendar essays are my favorite part of the old almanacs, because many of them (the early ones in particular) reveal a humanity that does not come through elsewhere. The essays often have a lively writing style that is, as far as I know, unique to the almanacs. 

.
New And Different Words
You will discover that the old agrarians used words we moderns seldom encounter in the 21st century. Words like rowen, snath, and numps. With that in mind, you will find some of these words highlighted in the text (just like in the previous sentence). If you click on the word, you will be taken to a definition provided by an online edition of Webster's 1828 dictionary.
 

No doubt, the almanac editors owned and used a Webster's. If you would like to look up the older definitions of words you do not know, check out the searchable  Webster's 1828 Dictionary Online
.
And Finally
I hope that reading and understanding the body of essays in the Farmer's Calendar Project  is an enjoyable and instructive adventure for you. In the end, I also hope that you will come to the realization (as I did) that farming and homesteading before 1900 was hard work, but it was not a brutal existence. Life in rural communities, lived close to nature and in harmony with the cycle of the seasons was, in  many ways, fuller and richer than the cubicle and couch potato lifestyle that characterizes much of our modern existence, or so it seems to me.


3 comments:

Brenda said...

This is fascinating. I am looking forward to future posts. I also put Webster's dictionary on my Amazon wish list.

Framing Reapers said...

Totally impressed with this farmers calendar project.

Elizabeth L. Johnson said...

Thanks so much for the history lesson. Really connected the dots for me from family farming to the industrial age and the curse of debt. Also, I would like to recommend the facsimile 1828 Noah Webster dictionary you mentioned. My children used it through all the 22 years of our home educating. In the front is Noah's testimony, and Bible scriptures are frequently used to demonstrate the use of words in the definitions. Pretty neat and a very good sixty-dollar investment in a person's knowledge.